Solutions & Opportunities

 Hi and welcome back to the blog! To wrap up I'll be talking about some of the creative solutions I have come across that could be more effective than 'changing social behaviour' or only building toilets.

Firstly, I will not deny that in some cases the issues are rather straightforward and so are their fixes. For example, Nakagiri  in their study found that in Kampala, the majority of latrines were full (51%) or even overflowing (15%). Most were dirty (43%) and in their survey, 89% of respondents expressed the need to improve the state and performance of the latrines. They concluded that pit latrines in the urban slums of Kampala were overloaded. Suggestions were made for interventions to improve the pit latrine should tackle the design and operation, with specific suggestions for  "minimising water inflows into the pit, increasing the air flow rate, minimising light in the superstructures." 

IkoToilet in Kosovo

One way to reduce open defecation and therefore contamination of water sources and improve peoples' experiences is through market-based approaches. Ecotact's Ikotoilet in Mathare was an attempt to create a self-sustaining public toilet through which people could have a better toilet experience. 

It operated slightly different than regular pay-per-use by using memberships. Households could buy a membership for the equivalent of USD $1.35 a month. The idea was that this membership would pay for the salaries and other expenses. The Ikotoilet was also slightly different in that it encouraged mico-entrepreneurs that could rent a kiosk to sell their goods in the toilet station.

However the location, size and lack of a significant marketing campaign meant that it was not as effective as Ecotact hoped.  It was built in Kosovo, 300m away from a field commonly used for open defecation. Ecotact's challenges demonstrated that "improving sanitation in a low income urban settlement could not be approached only from an infrastructure, hardware angle."

Alternatives?

Interestingly,  human excreta represents a resource that could be used to promote environmental quality, meet human livelihood needs and generate economic benefits. The key example is the recycling of 'humanure' for agriculture. Some of the examples I'll talk a bit about below attempt to incorporate environmentalism within their solution. 

Sanergy and Fresh Life toilets (CLTS)

One way to reduce open defecation and therefore  reduce contamination of water sources and improve peoples' experiences is through market-based approaches. This particular example also relies on local entrepreneurs in their communities.  Thieme's work has highlighted the importance of micro-entrepreneurs and Sanergy utilises this to provide safe, maintained toilets to all alongside economic opportunity. 

A key example is Sanergy and their Fresh Life toilets in Nairobi. Sanergy was founded by a group of graduate students from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sanergy introduce Fresh Life pay-per-use toilets that are purchased by local entrepreneurs. It also allows for microfinancing options so the 'entrepreneur' can pay back the cost ($500) over a year. The owner of the toilet cleans them and collects a small fee per use. These toilets are meant to be affordable to users and have a handwashing station. They look very similar to portaloos in that they are small and compact cubicles. The fresh life toilets handwashing station and shape allows them to be preferable for comfort and hygiene whilst being placed in the middle of the city instead of just the ourskirts improves accessibility and economic opportunity. 

There is also a large barrel beneath the squat-plate where solid and liquid waste is collected. The barrels are then filled and collected by Sanergy. The waste is transported to a processing plant south of Nairobi where it is converted to fertiliser, biogas or insect-based animal feed in an attempt to be more environmentally friendly and create opportunities for new markets. 
In this way, Sanergy is involved in all 3/4 steps of a sanitation chain.



diagram of a sanitation service chain source


Sanergy's waste collection involvement and their idea to treat the waste and create a good out of it where majority of people in East African cities live in informal settlements and use facilities serviced by providers that collect waste but do not treat or dispose of it meaning that much of it is dumped back into drainage systems or open water bodies. Sanergy is also better in preventing landlords becoming the ultimate beneficiaries. Landlords receive no direct return on investment and many do not live in the area.

Limitations

One of the problems with Sanergy is that it still doesn't quite address the gendered safety concerns because Fresh Life toilets are closed at night. Nairobi's informal settlements can be dangerous at night and so women therefore would still have to revert to 'flying toilets'. In addition, Sanergy still operates on a pay-per-use and so again the weighting of importance between a good toilet experience and education/ food costs would still provide some resistance. 


thanks for reading! see my next post for a couple more solutions that better incorporate women's safety and comfort concerns.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Why Why?

Image
Why Water and Sanitation? Hi and welcome to the first post of my blog!  This post will be about why I've chosen this particular theme for my blog and some of the ideas that I've found very interesting in the  papers from the reading list so far. What is sanitation? According to the Cambridge dictionary , sanitation is 'the systems for taking dirty water and other waste products away from buildings in order to protect people's health'.  Sanitation is recognized as a human right by the UN General Assembly yet not everyone has access to adequate sanitation. Why the theme? Personal Experience Well, the majority of my childhood was spent living in Mauritius where we had to boil our tap water and let it cool before drinking. I remember in my time at secondary school here in the UK, I was made aware of the fact that the water from my tap here had been treated and was safe to drink without having to boil (and also that limescale was the result of hard water an...
Read more

A different perspective for Malawi's 'Water Crisis'

Image
 Hi and welcome back to my blog on Water and Sanitation in Africa. In this post, I have come across some interesting literature regarding water quality in Lilongwe, Malawi that challenged mainstream, oversimplified ideas. The background: As of this year, an estimated 1,170,000 people live in Lilongwe with a growth rate of 4.38%( World Population Review )compared to a total 19,800,000 in Malawi ( World Population Review ).   According to  UNICEF , there is an inequality between urban and rural areas. Improved drinking water sources are said to be more common 'at 87%' in urban areas than rural '63%'. What does that even mean? 87% coverage? What does 87% coverage even look like?   More people living in rural areas have to spend more time collecting water than those in urban areas.   More importantly, however, are the reasons proposed: Neglected/Old Water points Poor access to sanitation services Increased Droughts and Floods Poor hygienic practice (i...
Read more

What can we learn from Lukaya?

Image
 Hi and welcome back to the blog! In the last post I talked about how water quality issues have been oversimplified by some charities in the media and, with the help of Boakye-Ansah's work, how sometimes the problems may be more political than they seem.  In this post we'll be looking at Lukaya, Uganda. In particular the on-site facilities available, their advantages (which helps explain why they're used) and also some of the issues that have been found.  1. The Water In Lukaya, the main sources of water are unprotected springs and shallow wells with hand pumps ( Nayebare et al. 2020 ). an image of a shallow well in Kenya (   source  ) So shallow wells are holes which have been dug/bored or drilled into the ground. They work by allowing people to access groundwater from an aquifer.  Shallow wells are only 'shallow' if they are less than ~50 feet deep.  So what are the pros/cons? Well (pardon the pun), the advantages of wells are that they allow people ...
Read more